Apr 09, · It's been all but confirmed by the models themselves that Freja Beha Erichsen and Arizona Muse, perhaps two of the most relevant and prolific models of the moment, are a Author: Dhani Mau. Jun 19, · And Arizona Muse, 28, was a picture of beauty and elegance as she wed her fiancé Boniface Verney-Carron in London over the weekend, chronicling her special day on Instagram.
Since when did Freja's sexuality become officially confirmed news? Did I miss the memo? The press release? Because to the best of my knowledge Freja has never officially said anything about her sexuality one way or another. Yes, yes we all assume but ssbb 100 completely free online dating a different story and that's not what is at dispute here. I've always taken her silence on the topic to mean that it's none of our business and I try to respect that. After all, this blog arizona muse freja beha dating mainly focused dtaing her work.
Big eyes that will stare into your guilty little soul. Big attitude: Of the incident, she replied "It was only a few stairs. Fortunately for CK's bank account, this genius marketing ploy goes both ways. If you see Lara somewhere, you don't think "Prada" or "Versus".
You think "Calvin Klein". This will take time and perhaps the new found eyebrows? So Tom Ford, until further notice, is doing free advertising for Calvin Klein. Just so that you know. Fortunately for Freja, she has not been as pigeon-holed as Lara Stone. Where the terms of Lara's contract essentially meant she was promoting ONLY Calvin Klein each season, Freja has been busy with campaigns for other labels, not just Chanel.
Freja is even setting up shop with Denmark's oldest luxury jewelry label Georg Jensen, not just as the company's face, but also as a designer. Earlier this month, she even became a philanthropist, which was totally rad do we want a post on this?
Suddenly, Freja and Chanel are looking more like biffles than conjoined twins, am I right? So in response to the frantic emails pouring into my inbox even as I type this, no, I am not worried.
Freja's career will live on for many years, whether she continues to appear in Chanel ads or not. In fact, chances are that she'll pop up in the eyewear campaign, or maybe even a perfume ad? If Freja and Chanel are done forever, I will happily eat a bolt of tweed, but I hardly think that that is the null hypothesis in this situation. Saskia has been getting a lot of hype the last two seasons, and I am looking forward to seeing how this all turns out for her.
And Joan Smalls? When was the last time Chanel had a black girl in their campaign? Racism has been a huge topic in fashion for such a long time, and I think it's great that we are beginning to see some of these barriers broken down.
This is my take on it all, but I know there's a wide range of opinions on this particular subject, so I'll leave the rest to you. If you agree, or disagree, or differ in opinion, I would love to hear what you have to say, and I'm sure everyone else would appreciate another perspective. So please take full advantage of the comment section below! If you're not comfortable with discussing this at the present time for whatever reason: If you can't be happy for Saskia and Joan, be happy for the bright future Freja has ahead of her.
She's facing the sun now, but she's definitely not casting any shadows. Peace, love, and floating, Gill Ford P. I'm pleased to see that you are taking full advantage of my email address, and encourage you all to continue to do so as you feel the need.
I'll do my best to answer any questions you have, whether they be Freja-related or otherwise. I already know some of you will think I'm being ridiculous or overly sensitive there sure seem to be a lot more of you out there nowadays ; but I just think this is all uncouth and invasive, especially since we all know how private of a person Freja is.
Besides, why is there such a need to know who she is off the runway? Isn't it enough that she's a tremendously talented model who gets a ton of work? Shouldn't that satisfy us as fans? Or does all of this stem from a desire to set Freja up as a role model of sorts? Top of her industry, well known, not exactly open about her sexuality but not dismissive or afraid of it either If this is the case, I completely understand the impetus behind it.
But I also think that if you're going to herald a person for being a specific way, that person should be able to openly embrace that aspect of themselves that you're heralding. There shouldn't be any hesitation or question about it. Confirming something and not saying anything about something are not the same thing. I'm not going to call Freja out for being a vegetarian if she's never said that she's a vegetarian.
Even if I only ever see her eat veggies, it's just not my place to say unless she says so herself, because for all I know she eats meat too.
Even if the possibility is small, it's still a possibility until it's been refuted. Hmmm, maybe that wasn't the best analogy since you choose vegetarianism while you're born with sexuality, but it's all I could come up with. Call me old-fashion, but I still place value in privacy and I still think that personal matters should remain personal, not spread around without consent.
Sadly in this day and age, there seem to be less and less people who feel this way as things like facebook and twitter allow us all to indulge the stalker within. I shudder to think what things will be like in years. Anyway, your thoughts on the matter? Do you think it's ok for sites like AE and Jezebel to out Freja? Or do you think her sexuality should be left out of the discussion completely? Keep in mind that Freja is a model and not a celebrity.
She didn't implicitly sign away her rights to privacy when she started to model 5 years ago. Model-as-cult-celebrity is a very recent phenomenon spurred on by the proliferation of the internet's role within the fashion industry. And it's an entirely different phenomenon from the era of the Supers. So I don't believe it's fair to cop-out and say that this is just part of the job, because it isn't and it shouldn't be.
And yes, I'm fully aware that this post is kind of hypocritical seeing as I'm talking about the very thing I'm essentially denouncing, but this is the first and last time I will address this topic. Sometimes you have to participate in the very thing you're speaking out against in order to make your point. It's the classic complicit vs. All you humanities majors should be very familiar with this.