Hey there, I'm still a newbie to the site and was turned on to it by my INTJ boyfriend. He loves this stuff, which is great because now I can try to. I'm going to post this topic in both the INFP and INTJ forums. I'm an INFP woman and recently just started dating an INTJ man. I've read mixed things regarding . If I can had to your very informative advice. I'd also suggest.
In order to better understand how INTJs approach dating and romantic relationships, it is necessary to consider the potential impact and implications of their infp intj dating advice primary personality functions Ni, Te, Fi, Se. Of course, INTJs would be the first calculatorul marturiseste online dating tell you that how we define lazy is entirely relative. As INTJs intuitively form impressions about the world, they naturally want to express them via their auxiliary Te. And because INTJs often prefer expressing themselves orally rather than in writing, they seek out others interested in hearing their knowledge and infp intj dating advice they resemble INFJs in this respect. In fact, one of the primary reasons INTJs seek relationships is to have someone to share ideas with.
And because INTJs often prefer expressing themselves orally rather than in writing, they seek out others interested in hearing their knowledge and insights they resemble INFJs in this respect. In fact, one of the primary reasons INTJs seek relationships is to have someone to share ideas with. When it comes to forming and developing relationships, INTJs often have a few factors working against them.
For one, they express themselves via their auxiliary Te rather than Fe. Consequently, like other TJ types, they can come across as blunt, mechanical, or lacking a certain degree of tact or social know-how.
Their reputation as arrogant know-it-alls can also be attributed, in part, to misperceptions involving their Te. While INFJs are strong in extraverting their judgments, INTJs can be even more so because they lack the peacemaking, people-pleasing, and socially sensitive elements of Fe. INTJs may also be labeled as excessively stubborn or rigid, although this too relates to Te-related misunderstandings.
In order to compensate for such misunderstandings, INTJs might reason that if they could only understand people better they could overcome their relational difficulties. This may inspire them to gather as many facts and self-help strategies as they can regarding human psychology and relationships. While there is certainly nothing wrong with doing so, it may not always remedy their predicament in the way they might expect.
For one, INTJs with a history of relational difficulties can be prone to attribute those failures to psychological problems in their partners, thereby failing to see their own shortcomings. While not necessarily their fault, this should comprise at least as much of their relational attention as trying to see and diagnose problems in their partners.
To be fair, accurate self-evaluation can be a problem for all J-types, since their preferred mode of Judging Fe or Te is directed outwardly rather than inwardly. This is one reason why typology can be so useful for INTJs, as well as other types. One of the hallmarks of Fi is a desire to preserve and defend the uniqueness of the individual.
Related to a strong concern for the individual is the Fi desire to aid the weak, helpless, and marginalized of society. This is why IFPs, for instance, can often be found helping the homeless, working with children with special needs, protecting endangered species, etc. Once we add Fi into the mix, it is not hard to see how INTJs might be attracted, even if unconsciously, to rescuing and fixing those who seem needy or helpless.
The relationship then becomes a sort of psychotherapeutic forum, with the INTJ working to analyze, diagnose, and treat his wounded partner. It zeroes in on the unique features of the individual and grows deeply attached to those qualities. While INTJs may not experience the consistent strength of feeling that FP types do, they are nonetheless influenced by the less conscious workings of Fi, which helps inspire loyalty, love, and commitment.
This makes it a highly alluring function, powerful enough to inspire a fierce and protracted tug-of-war with the dominant function. It can be incredibly difficult for Architects to find someone up to the task. Finding a compatible partner is the most significant challenge the majority of Architects will face in life.
The problem is that common, ritualistic dating practices grew over time to make introductions between potential partners easier. They help couples gradually develop a connection. This can make dating difficult for them. The lesson Architects often learn is that the ways of love are hard to describe on a spreadsheet.
As they mature, Architects often come to see romantic rituals as important. But until they do, it can be risky, especially for Turbulent Architects. If they are shot down too many times when younger, they may decide that everyone else is too irrational or beneath them intellectually. They are most appealing when they are doing what they do best. Generally, that means working in a familiar environment where their confidence and intelligence can shine.
Then, if they believe a relationship has potential, they will spare no effort in developing and maintaining stability and long-term satisfaction. Architects typically give a huge amount of freedom to the people they love. They are usually trusting partners. People with the Architect personality type may never be very comfortable sharing their feelings, and they may spend more time thinking about love than expressing it. But, using their strategic thinking, they usually figure out how to make a situation work for everyone — including the act of falling in love.
Architects seek strong, deep relationships, and trust their knowledge and logic to ensure that their partner is satisfied, both intellectually and physically. But when it comes to emotional satisfaction, Architects are often out of their element.
Not every partner likes addressing conflicts and emotional needs as cold puzzles to be analyzed and solved as Architects do.